Trigger Priority setting?

[Senuhet]

Can you make a priority system for triggers?

Example: 2 different macros use Bluetooth connectivity as a triggers but perform different functions with multiple steps. Under a priority system 1 macro will perform it's functions and the second macro will wait for the first macro to finish then perform it's functions. Currently these macros seem to interfere with each other.

I understand I could cram these two macros together however if they function under two different categories it would be much nicer to have them separate in categories that make sense visually.

Does anyone else think this would be beneficial?

 

[Pseudocyclic]

Have you tried replacing the second macro Bluetooth Event trigger with Empty Trigger, and adding a Macro Run action to the end of the first macro?

 

[Senuhet]

Have you tried replacing the second macro Bluetooth Event trigger with Empty Trigger, and adding a Macro Run action to the end of the first macro?

That's definitely something I could do for now, but I think my original idea would have more utility than daisy-chaining macros together. In the scenario you describe if I have three or four macros running like this and I delete the thrid one it will break the fourth, but for now I will strongly consider your recommendation

 

[Dm114]

That's definitely something I could do for now, but I think my original idea would have more utility than daisy-chaining macros together. In the scenario you describe if I have three or four macros running like this and I delete the thrid one it will break the fourth, but for now I will strongly consider your recommendation

I'm afraid it won't be possible to assign a priority to triggers. To avoid several macros having same triggers and firing randomly, I created a unique macro gathering nearly all the necessary triggers and running the appropriate macro according to context. So, almost all my macros have no trigger ('Empty trigger') and cannot compete with any other one.