v5.47 - Feedback

MacroDroidDev

Administrator
Staff member
"Enable restricted settings" doesn't show in the menu of the released version (5.46.10), does it appear in the bata version?
Going back and forward to Beta and release is a time-consuming process, I have to fix many macros manually (Play FileName has to be re-pointed) to the file again)

View attachment 10622
This is because you installed from outside an app store. I can't remember the exact way to show this option right now but if you google this issue you should find it.
 

dhj49er

Well-known member
The clipboard contents constraint returns a fail when the clipboard contents match the constraint.

See the attached macro.

The clipboard content should change to 12345, but doesn't and the popup message displays abcde.
I have tried using regular expression and case insensitive settings in the constraint, but it always fails.

I haven't used this constraint before & wondered if other users are seeing the same issue or not.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240802-084559_MacroDroid.png
    Screenshot_20240802-084559_MacroDroid.png
    161.7 KB · Views: 7

MacroDroidDev

Administrator
Staff member
The clipboard contents constraint returns a fail when the clipboard contents match the constraint.

See the attached macro.

The clipboard content should change to 12345, but doesn't and the popup message displays abcde.
I have tried using regular expression and case insensitive settings in the constraint, but it always fails.

I haven't used this constraint before & wondered if other users are seeing the same issue or not.
Thanks, This issue will be fixed in the next beta.
 

ZnAK

New member
I measured the running time of the macro on versions 5.47.0 to 5.47.7. The performance was really impressive up to and including version 5.47.5, but in versions 5.47.6 and 5.47.7, the process slowed down again by about two times from the previous results.
 

dhj49er

Well-known member
I measured the running time of the macro on versions 5.47.0 to 5.47.7. The performance was really impressive up to and including version 5.47.5, but in versions 5.47.6 and 5.47.7, the process slowed down again by about two times from the previous results.
Do you have a macro that you have a v5 47.7 time for and that you could upload?

I'd be interested in running the macro and comparing times
 

ZnAK

New member
Do you have a macro that you have a v5 47.7 time for and that you could upload?

I'd be interested in running the macro and comparing times
Yes, there is an action block. But it's in Russian. You can take measurements yourself. Just create three integer variables. Place the START at the very beginning of the macro, and the STOP and TIME at the very end. For START and STOP, set the {system_time_ms} option. and in the variable TIME, make a STOP minus START.
 

dhj49er

Well-known member
Do you have execution times for this action block?

How many times do you run the action block to record the execution times?
 

ZnAK

New member
My times on v5 47.7 are
Shortest 9
Longest 13
Average 11 (6 runs)
You have made relative measurements that depend on the power of the device and depend on the version of the MD on which the test is performed. Okay, then I'm posting a macro and a separate action block.
Test the marked trigger. The direction can be switched by the marked local variable.

1,1.png
 

Attachments

  • Bubble_sorting_algorithm_opt.ablock
    28.3 KB · Views: 1
  • Bubble_sorting_algorithm_opt.macro
    106.2 KB · Views: 2

dhj49er

Well-known member
I don't know why your times are so long for an action block that creates 3 Integer variables.

I doubt my phone is 60 times faster than your phone.

I haven't noticed any slow down when using the different versions of v5.47.
 

ZnAK

New member
I don't know why your times are so long for an action block that creates 3 Integer variables.

I doubt my phone is 60 times faster than your phone.

I haven't noticed any slow down when using the different versions of v5.47.
The question is not about the computing power of the devices. If there is a desire, then you need to experiment with my macro on different versions of MD.
 

dhj49er

Well-known member
The question is not about the computing power of the devices. If there is a desire, then you need to experiment with my macro on different versions of MD.
I'm sorry but I'm not prepared to experiment by running different versions of MD.

As I have said, I haven't noticed any slowing down.

Why is the 3 Integer action block over 60 times slower on your device?
 

ZnAK

New member
I'm sorry but I'm not prepared to experiment by running different versions of MD.

As I have said, I haven't noticed any slowing down.

Why is the 3 Integer action block over 60 times slower on your device?
I'm sorry, but then what is this empty dialogue for? The original purpose of the question was to test the macro on different versions.
 

dhj49er

Well-known member
I'm sorry, but then what is this empty dialogue for? The a original purpose of the question was to test the macro on different versions.
The original post was a statement not a request to test a macro on different versions.

Empty dialogue?

I created an action block and tested it for you.

You don't seem bothered by the large difference in times.

Instead you moved to a different macro and action block, demanding testing with different versions of MD.

Please accept I'm not prepared to install different versions of MD, especially as I have not noticed a slowdown in MD.
 
Top